In the first half of our exploration, we focused on CSM’s wayfinding system’s access barriers for everyone on campus. By focusing on the system instead of a specific group, we tried to be as inclusive as possible and make the best possible version. We created colour palettes that would work for colour-blind people and looked for access barriers for people with low mobility.
The resulting analysis revealed several fundamental issues that could represent access barriers. While tackling them is valuable and needed, we overlooked many other obstacles that only people who have experienced them could point out.
In the final part of our work, we chose dyslexic people as our audience, which allowed for more focused research. We also reached out to dyslexic people, created a survey aimed at our audience, and interviewed one of the respondents. It was the first brief I engaged with my target audience. The fact that I am not dyslexic made it even more relevant.
Our problem-solving approach early on steered us into looking for one definitive solution. After the tutorial feedback, I realised that acknowledging my position and biases gives context to my work and situates it in a larger body of knowledge around design and disability justice.
Continue reading Written Response for Methods of Contextualising